Cover
Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026)

Published: June 30, 2026

Pages: 59-67

Research Article

Impact of shading ratio on Silicon monocrystalline solar module yield and power output

Abstract

Shadows dramatically reduce solar panel output because individual cells are wired in chains (series). Blocking one cell chokes the current for the entire chain. While bypass diodes bypass shaded sections, severe shadows can still cause "hot spots", which permanently damage panels. The proposed  work presents an experimental measurements on the impact of shading on monocrystalline power losses. The solar module is exposed under the real environment conditions for direct solar radiation of 500 W/m2 and 80 W/m2 solar radiation at penumbra shading of shaded area with operating solar module temperature 25oC at ambient temperature 18oC. The Solar Module Analyzer  simulator was used in this study, where 10 pattern  of shading are tested. The photovoltaic solar module performance in terms of outlet power and fill factor with its corresponding efficiency are greatly affected by shadow. The maximum output power drops drastically, often much more than the shaded area percentage would suggest ; 25% shading can lead to 60% power loss and also 50% shading can lead to 60% power loss. It is noticeable that there is a sudden change in the behavior of the I-V and P-V characteristic curves at a certain range of open circuit voltage 9-9.5V.

References

  1. O. M. Toledo, D. O. Filho, A. S. A. C. Diniz, J. H. Martins, and M. H. M. Vale, "Methodology for Evaluation of Grid-Tie Connection of Distributed Energy Resources—Case Study with Photovoltaic and Energy Storage," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1132–1139, May 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2207971.
  2. A. E. Brooks, D. Cormode, A. D. Cronin, and E. Kam-Lum, "PV System Power Loss and Module Damage Due to Partial Shade and Bypass Diode Failure Depend on Cell Behavior in Reverse Bias," in Proc. IEEE 42nd Photovoltaic Spec. Conf. (PVSC), New Orleans, LA, USA, Jun. 2015, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2015.7356290.
  3. E. Batzelis, P. Georgilakis, and S. Papathanassiou, "Energy Models for Photovoltaic Systems Under Partial Shading Conditions: A Comprehensive Review," IET Renew. Power Gener., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 340–349, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rpg.2014.0207.
  4. P. L. Hidalgo-Gonzalez, A. E. Brooks, E. S. Kopp, V. P. Lonij, and A. D. Cronin, "String-Level (kW-Scale) I-V Curves from Different Module Types Under Partial Shade," in Proc. 38th IEEE Photovoltaic Spec. Conf. (PVSC), Austin, TX, USA, Jun. 2012, pp. 1442–1447. https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2012.6317868.
  5. J. Bai, Y. Cao, Y. Hao, Z. Zhang, S. Liu, and F. Cao, "Characteristic Output of PV Systems Under Partial Shading or Mismatch Conditions," Sol. Energy, vol. 112, pp. 41–54, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.09.048.
  6. S. Z. M. Golroodbari, A. C. de Waal, and W. G. J. H. M. van Sark, "Improvement of Shade Resilience in Photovoltaic Modules Using Buck Converters in a Smart Module Architecture," Energies, vol. 11, no. 1, art. no. 250, Jan. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11010250.
  7. A. Triki-Lahiani, A. B. B. Abdelghani, and I. Slama-Belkhodja, "Fault Detection and Monitoring Systems for Photovoltaic Installations: A Review," Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 82, pp. 2680–2692, Feb. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.101.
  8. A. K. Tripathi, M. Aruna, and C. S. Murthy, "Performance of a PV Panel Under Different Shading Strengths," Int. J. Ambient Energy, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 248–253, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2017.1388839.
  9. B. Hu, J. Wu, P. Li, W. Sun, and J. Xiao, "Calculating the Shading Reduction Coefficient of Photovoltaic System Efficiency Using the Anisotropic Sky Scattering Model," Glob. Energy Interconnect., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 375–384, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloei.2022.08.004.
  10. F. Bayrak and H. F. Oztop, "Effects of Static and Dynamic Shading on Thermodynamic and Electrical Performance for Photovoltaic Panels," Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 169, art. no. 114900, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.114900.
  11. S. G. Krishna and T. Moger, "Reconfiguration Strategies for Reducing Partial Shading Effects in Photovoltaic Arrays: State of the Art," Sol. Energy, vol. 182, pp. 429–452, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.02.057.
  12. K. Osmani, A. Haddad, H. Jaber, T. Lemenand, B. Castanier, and M. Ramadan, "Mitigating the Effects of Partial Shading on PV System Performance Through PV Array Reconfiguration: A Review," Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog., vol. 31, art. no. 101280, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2022.101280.
  13. A. Ba, A. Ndiaye, E. H. M. Ndiaye, and S. Mbodji, "Power Optimization of a Photovoltaic System with Artificial Intelligence Algorithms over Two Seasons in Tropical Area," MethodsX, vol. 10, no. 1, art. no. 101959, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101959.
  14. W. Liu, Y. Shen, P. Aungkulanon, M. Ghalandari, B. N. Le, A. Alviz-Meza, and Y. Cárdenas-Escrocia, "Machine Learning Applications for Photovoltaic System Optimization in Zero Green Energy Buildings," Energy Rep., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 2787–2796, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.01.114.
  15. M. Dhimish and P. I. Lazaridis, "An Empirical Investigation on the Correlation Between Solar Cell Cracks and Hotspots," Sci. Rep., vol. 11, no. 1, art. no. 23961, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03498-z.
  16. C. E. Clement, J. P. Singh, E. Birgersson, Y. Wang, and Y. S. Khoo, "Hotspot Development and Shading Response of Shingled PV Modules," Sol. Energy, vol. 207, no. 1, pp. 729–735, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.06.078.
  17. C. Olalla, M. N. Hasan, C. Deline, and D. Maksimović, "Mitigation of Hotspots in Photovoltaic Systems Using Distributed Power Electronics," Energies, vol. 11, no. 4, art. no. 726, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11040726.
  18. M. Dhimish, M. Theristis, and V. d'Alessandro, "Photovoltaic Hotspots: A Mitigation Technique and Its Thermal Cycle," Optik, vol. 300, art. no. 171627, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2024.171627.